Prediction of Matthew Illingworth vs Marcus Daniell Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Illingworth vs M. Daniell

Matthew Illingworth
GBR
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
38
Age
36
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
500
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$4.2K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Marcus Daniell
NZL
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
38
Age
36
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
500
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$4.2K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Illingworth 1 - 1 Daniell
They have played 4 sets in total, with Matthew Illingworth winning 2 and Marcus Daniell winning 2. The last match between Matthew Illingworth and Marcus Daniell was at the Great Britain F14, 14-09-2009, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Matthew Illingworth getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Illingworth | 1 |
| Daniell | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Great Britain F14(09-14-09)
Matthew Illingworth
6
6
Marcus Daniell
2
2
(R2) Great Britain F11(07-28-08)
Marcus Daniell
7
7
Matthew Illingworth
5
5
M. Illingworth vs M. Daniell H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,155 |
| 37.67% (55-91) | Career Total W/L | 47.51% (143-158) |
| 0 | Grass | 1 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Illingworth vs M. Daniell Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matthew Illingworth has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marcus Daniell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matthew Illingworth, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marcus Daniell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matthew Illingworth has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marcus Daniell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matthew Illingworth has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marcus Daniell winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matthew Illingworth has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 19/26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/8). Marcus Daniell has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 26/19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 12/23).
- Player level: In the last year, Matthew Illingworth has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marcus Daniell has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Matthew Illingworth winning 1 times and Marcus Daniell being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Matthew Illingworth winning 2 and Marcus Daniell winning 2.
- The last match between Matthew Illingworth and Marcus Daniell was at the Great Britain F14, 14-09-2009, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Matthew Illingworth getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matthew Illingworth has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marcus Daniell has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matthew Illingworth has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marcus Daniell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matthew Illingworth has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marcus Daniell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Matthew Illingworth vs Marcus Daniell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Illingworth vs M. Daniell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 18 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Illingworth 0%, Daniell 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Illingworth 0%, Daniell 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Illingworth 0%, Daniell 0%.
M. Illingworth Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(2) 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
M. Daniell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | ||
Rubber 4 | L | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||

M. Illingworth vs M. Daniell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.67% (55/91) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.68% (144/158) |
| 40.90% (137/198) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.85% (323/352) |
| 46.93% (1483/1677) | Games Win/Loss | 50.38% (3207/3159) |
| 42.22% (19/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.80% (87/95) |
| 41.38% (12/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.29% (12/23) |
| 35.48% (22/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.50% (19/21) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 288 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 196 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 470.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 567.97 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 67% (2839/4261) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1952/2839) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (673/1422) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (159/390) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1644/4238) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 29.41% (5/12) |
| 18.75% (3/13) | Challenger W/L | 49.28% (34/35) |
| 40.00% (52/78) | Futures W/L | 48.60% (104/110) |
| 38% (55/146) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (140/286) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 38% (17/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (38/90) |
| 37% (16/43) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (43/80) |
| 74% (62/46) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (141/119) |
| 26% (62/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (141/21) |
| 11% (84/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (160/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction11:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction11:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction07:30 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
23:05
H2H 1-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal